Tags: experimentation ux map
CRO
Date: 2026-08-16
Conversion rate optimisation is a loop, not a list of tactics: find where people fail, form a hypothesis about why, test it honestly, and keep what survives. Every stage borrows from a different domain, which is why nobody owns the whole thing.
A cross-domain view. Nothing here is filed in /Maps/ — every note lives in its home domain, and this is the order the work actually happens in.
Draws on Analytics, User Experience, Experimentation, Statistics and Commerce & Growth.
The procedural counterpart, following the same order with the arithmetic worked: Guide - Ecommerce CRO.
1. Find where it’s failing
Quantitative first, to locate. Qualitative second, to explain. Doing it in the other order produces confident answers to the wrong question.
- Funnel Analysis — where people leave, and the step-definition choices that move the answer
- Segmentation (analysis) — the group the average was hiding
- Sessionisation — before believing any session-scoped rate
- Session Replay — watching the failure, once you know where to look
- Heatmaps — aggregate attention and interaction
- Form Analytics — field-level abandonment, the highest-yield diagnostic in checkout
- Voice of Customer Data — surveys, support tickets, and what people say is wrong
- Usability Testing — the method that explains why faster than any amount of data
- Triangulation — reconciling all of the above when they disagree
- Guide - Running a Conversion Audit — the full sweep, as a procedure
Before trusting any of it: the symptom list in Analytics MOC and Guide - Auditing a Tracking Plan. A large share of “conversion problems” are measurement problems, and finding that out after three months of testing is the classic waste.
2. Explain it
The diagnosis stage. A finding without a mechanism produces a test that can’t teach you anything.
- Cognitive Load — the budget every interface spends
- Choice Overload — more options, fewer decisions
- Trust Signals — what actually moves credibility
- Loss Aversion · Anchoring · Framing Effects — the three that explain most pricing and offer behaviour
- Error Prevention and Recovery — the form and checkout failures that look like disinterest
- Loading and Perceived Performance — slowness as an abandonment cause, not a technical metric
- Value Propositions — whether the page answers “why this, why you, why now”
- The Offer · Risk Reversal — when the objection is to what’s being sold rather than to the page selling it
- Awareness Stages — whether the page assumes more, or less, than the visitor already knows
- Deceptive Design — the line, and the UK regulatory position on crossing it
3. Prioritise
- Test Prioritisation — ICE, PIE, and their honest limitations
- Metric Sensitivity — whether you have the traffic to detect what you’re proposing
- Minimum Detectable Effect — deciding what’s worth detecting before designing the test
- Win Rate and Expected Value — the arithmetic that beats scoring frameworks: probability × impact × reach ÷ cost
- Performance and Conversion — often the highest-value item on the list, and rarely on it
4. Form the hypothesis
A hypothesis needs a mechanism — the reason the change should work. That reason usually comes from behavioural principles, which is the half of CRO this map would otherwise skip.
- Cognitive Load · Choice Overload · Hick’s Law — friction from too much to process
- Social Proof · Authority · Trust Signals — evidence and credibility
- Scarcity and Urgency · Loss Aversion · Framing Effects — pressure and presentation, and where each stops being honest
- Commitment and Consistency · The Default Effect — sequencing and what’s preselected
- Deceptive Design — the line, and where UK law now sits
Then the hypothesis itself:
- Hypothesis Design — a mechanism and a prediction, not a preference with a metric attached
- Overall Evaluation Criterion — the single primary metric, decided now
- Guardrail Metrics — what must not get worse
- Pre-Registration — writing the analysis plan before the data exists
5. Test it
- Guide - Running an Experiment — the full procedure, and Guide - Statistics for CRO for the arithmetic
- Randomisation Unit — user, not session. Almost always
- Sample Size Calculation — baseline, MDE, power, significance
- Test Duration — full business cycles, not just sample size
- Client-Side vs Server-Side Testing — and the flicker tax if client-side
- A-A Tests — proving the machinery before trusting it
- Sample Ratio Mismatch — the first thing to check, every time
- Experiment QA — before traffic, not after
6. Read the result
The stage where most value is destroyed, by people acting in good faith.
- Guide - Statistics for CRO — the ordered checks, and reading the interval rather than the p-value
- P-Values — what the number is, and the four things it isn’t
- Confidence Intervals — the range, which is the honest output
- Statistical Power — because an underpowered test that “lost” told you nothing
- Peeking — why the result you looked at on day three isn’t the result
- Segmentation (test results) — post-hoc slicing, and why nearly every finding from it is noise
- Winner’s Curse — why shipped winners underdeliver
- Inconclusive Results — the most common outcome, and not a failure
7. Ship and hold
- Feature Flags — shipping the winner without a release
- Post-Test Validation — checking the change delivered what the test promised
- Holdout Groups — measuring cumulative programme effect over a year
- Guide - Running an Experiment — its closing section covers the archive, so the same idea isn’t retested in eighteen months
8. Make the programme compound
Individual tests barely matter. The system that produces them does.
- Experimentation Velocity — tests per period as the real driver
- Win Rate and Expected Value — most tests fail; the arithmetic across all of them is the return
- Institutional Learning — turning results into beliefs, and revising beliefs when results contradict them
- Communicating Uncertainty — presenting ranges to people who want a number
- Experimentation Maturity — the bottleneck at each stage
Where CRO stops
Worth stating, because the discipline gets blamed for these.
- Traffic quality is acquisition’s problem — a page can’t convert badly-matched intent. See Channel Mix and Landing Page Strategy
- Margin is pricing’s problem — conversion rate can rise while contribution margin falls. See Contribution Margin and Discount Impact on Margin
- Retention is lifecycle’s problem — optimising first purchase says nothing about the second. See Repeat Purchase Rate
- Genuine incrementality at channel level needs Incrementality Testing, not on-site testing