Tags: experimentation ux map

CRO

Date: 2026-08-16


Conversion rate optimisation is a loop, not a list of tactics: find where people fail, form a hypothesis about why, test it honestly, and keep what survives. Every stage borrows from a different domain, which is why nobody owns the whole thing.


A cross-domain view. Nothing here is filed in /Maps/ — every note lives in its home domain, and this is the order the work actually happens in.

Draws on Analytics, User Experience, Experimentation, Statistics and Commerce & Growth.

The procedural counterpart, following the same order with the arithmetic worked: Guide - Ecommerce CRO.

1. Find where it’s failing

Quantitative first, to locate. Qualitative second, to explain. Doing it in the other order produces confident answers to the wrong question.

Before trusting any of it: the symptom list in Analytics MOC and Guide - Auditing a Tracking Plan. A large share of “conversion problems” are measurement problems, and finding that out after three months of testing is the classic waste.

2. Explain it

The diagnosis stage. A finding without a mechanism produces a test that can’t teach you anything.

3. Prioritise

4. Form the hypothesis

A hypothesis needs a mechanism — the reason the change should work. That reason usually comes from behavioural principles, which is the half of CRO this map would otherwise skip.

Then the hypothesis itself:

5. Test it

6. Read the result

The stage where most value is destroyed, by people acting in good faith.

7. Ship and hold

8. Make the programme compound

Individual tests barely matter. The system that produces them does.

Where CRO stops

Worth stating, because the discipline gets blamed for these.